MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110394945 · doi:10.14740/jocmr2371w

Problems of Perinatal Mental Health Care in Tokyo, Japan

2015· article· en· W2110394945 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shunji Suzuki, Takashi Takeuchi, Tadaharu Okano, Naoki Kamiya, Takashi Sugiyama, Mayumi Ebine, Hideo Matsuda, Toshihito Suzuki, Takashi Okai, Satoru Takeda, Kazuhiko Ochiai, Katsuyuki Kinoshita

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMental healthGeneral hospitalPsychiatryFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, a dramatic increase in pregnancies complicated by mental disorders has been observed in Tokyo, Japan [1, 2]. In 2014, the estimated number of deliveries complicated by mental disorders was 1,800 [2]. The rate of general hospital with psychiatric inpatient beds is only about 16% of the delivery facilities in Tokyo; however, about 36% of the deliveries with mental disorders were managed by these general hospitals. These rates are feared to lead to the tremendous burden of both obstetrics and psychiatric staffs of the general hospitals in Tokyo. To know the reason why many deliveries with mild mental disorders are managed in a small number of general hospitals, we requested 85 private obstetric clinics to provide the reason why they introduced even deliveries with mild mental disorders to the general hospitals. Because many of the deliveries with mental disorders managed at the general hospital seemed to be not severe as necessary to be managed at the higher-order facilities. A total of 57 (67%) of them responded. The most common reason (26/57, 46%) was “We cannot examine the severity of mental disorders” and the second common reason was “It is difficult to take reservation of psychiatric clinics for pregnant women”. Therefore, they seemed to introduce all pregnant women suspected having mental disorders to the general hospitals. On the other hand, about 60% of the staffs of the psychiatric clinics in Tokyo seemed to be worried excessively about the influence of medications on both fetuses and pregnant women (Takeuchi and Okano, unpublished data). Therefore, some psychiatrists also seemed to introduce all pregnant women with mental disorders to the general hospitals. For the proper management of perinatal psychosis, it is necessary to build a smooth cooperation system of obstetricians and psychiatrists. As the first step of the cooperation, the guidelines for the determination of severity of mental disorders by obstetricians those obtained a consensus between the obstetricians and psychiatrists are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.300
GPT teacher head0.578
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine ResearchSame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207