A comparison of the effects of environmental ammonia exposure on the Asian freshwater stingray<i>Himantura signifer</i>and the Amazonian freshwater stingray<i>Potamotrygon motoro</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The white-edge whip tail ray Himantura signifer inhabits a freshwater environment but has retained the capability to synthesize urea de novo through the arginine-ornithine-urea cycle (OUC). The present study aimed to elucidate whether the capacity of urea synthesis in H. signifer could be upregulated in response to environmental ammonia exposure. When H. signifer was exposed to environmental ammonia, fairly high concentrations of ammonia were accumulated in the plasma and other tissues. This would subsequently reduce the net influx of exogenous ammonia by reducing the NH(3) partial pressure gradient across the branchial and body surfaces. There was also an increase in the OUC capacity in the liver. Since the ammonia produced endogenously could not be excreted effectively in the presence of environmental ammonia, it was detoxified into urea through the OUC. In comparison, the South American freshwater stingray Potamotrygon motoro, which has lost the capability to synthesize urea de novo, was unable to detoxify ammonia to urea during ammonia loading. No increase in glutamine was observed in the various tissues of H. signifer exposed to environmental ammonia despite a significant increase in the hepatic glutamine synthetase activity. These results indicate that the excess glutamine formed was channelled completely into urea formation through carbamoyl phosphate synthetase III. It has been reported elsewhere that both urea synthesis and urea retention were upregulated in H. signifer exposed to 20 per thousand water for osmoregulatory purposes. By contrast, for H. signifer exposed to environmental ammonia in freshwater, the excess urea formed was excreted to the external medium instead. This suggests that the effectiveness of urea synthesis de novo as a strategy to detoxify ammonia is determined not simply by an increase in the capacity of urea synthesis but, more importantly, by the ability of the animal to control the direction (i.e. absorption or excretion) and rate of urea transport. Our results suggest that such a strategy began to develop in those elasmobranchs, e.g. H. signifer, that migrate into a freshwater environment from the sea but not in those permanently adapted to a freshwater environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".