Functional Analysis of Conserved Polar Residues in Vc-NhaD, Na+/H+ Antiporter of Vibrio cholerae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vc-NhaD is a Na(+)/H(+) antiporter from Vibrio cholerae with a sharp maximum of activity at pH approximately 8.0. NhaD homologues are present in many bacteria as well as in higher plants. However, very little is known about structure-function relations in NhaD-type antiporters. In this work 14 conserved polar residues associated with putative transmembrane segments of Vc-NhaD have been screened for their possible role in the ion translocation and pH regulation of Vc-NhaD. Substitutions S150A, D154G, N155A, N189A, D199A, T201A, T202A, S389A, N394G, S428A, and S431A completely abolished the Vc-NhaD-mediated Na(+)-dependent H(+) transfer in inside-out membrane vesicles. Substitutions T157A and S428A caused a significant increase of apparent K(m) values for alkali cations, with the K(m) for Li(+) elevated more than that for Na(+), indicating that Thr-157 and Ser-428 are involved in alkali cation binding/translocation. Of six conserved His residues, mutation of only His-93 and His-210 affected the Na(+)(Li(+))/H(+) antiport, resulting in an acidic shift of its pH profile, whereas H93A also caused a 7-fold increase of apparent K(m) for Na(+) without affecting the K(m) for Li(+). These data suggest that side chains of His-93 and His-210 are involved in proton binding and that His-93 also contributes to the binding of Na ions during the catalytic cycle. These 15 residues are clustered in three distinct groups, two located at opposite sides of the membrane, presumably facilitating the access of substrate ions to the third group, a putative catalytic site in the middle of lipid bilayer. The distribution of these key residues in Vc-NhaD molecule also suggests that transmembrane segments IV, V, VI, X, XI, and XII are situated close to one another, creating a transmembrane relay of charged/polar residues involved in the attraction, coordination, and translocation of transported cations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".