Investigation of Characteristics of Contact Bandages and Support Rollers of Rotating Technological Drums
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient operation of rotating technological units in the period between overhauls largely depends on parts of backup abutments - bandages and rollers. At the same time an effect of rolling surfaces ground contact areas shape of these parts takes place, which in the end determine contact spot characteristics. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of errors form surfaces bearing parts as well as their relative position on the stress- strain state in the contact zone. As a result of studies questions concerning contact surfaces modeling of bandages rolling surface and support roller of technological drums conditions, influence of their relative positioning on surface formation in a contact zone were resolved. Geometric and power characteristics of contact spot for various cases of positional relationship of bandages and rollers axles were obtained. The simulation results generally show that the length of the contact patch at small angles of rotation (3 degrees) does not change significantly; lowest stresses occur at the ends of the contact line, and change in length are unevenly; the maximum stress occurs at the center of the rotation axis and a third stress higher than the case where the axis are parallel. Contact patch shape is slightly different from the rectangular shape, but is asymmetric with respect to the axis of the bandage; a zone of low stresses at the ends of the contact spot, shows a change in the contact patch shape from a rectangle to an asymmetrical oval.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".