MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110463721 · doi:10.1139/v2012-050

Theoretical study on the chemical formation mechanism of a β-myrcene ozonolysis reaction under atmospheric conditions

2012· article· en· W2110463721 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuyang Zhao, Jing Bai, Chenxi Zhang, Chen Gong, Xiaomin Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryOzonolysisReaction rate constantRRKM theoryArrhenius equationDensity functional theoryTransition state theoryComputational chemistryReaction mechanismPotential energy surfaceTransition stateReaction ratePhysical chemistryPhotochemistryThermodynamicsActivation energyOrganic chemistryMoleculeQuantum mechanicsKineticsCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Density functional theory (DFT) was used to study the β-myrcene ozonolysis reaction. The reactants, intermediates, transition states, and products were optimized at the MPWB1K/6–31G(d,p) level. The single-point energies were performed at the MPWB1K/6–311+G(3df,2p) level. The profiles of the potential energy surfaces were constructed and the rate constants of the reaction steps were analyzed. The possible reaction mechanisms for the ozonolysis intermediates in real atmosphere are also discussed. Based on quantum chemistry information, the rate constants were calculated using Rice–Ramsperger–Kassel–Marcus (RRKM) theory and the canonical variational transition-state theory (CVT) with small curvature tunneling effect (SCT). Arrhenius equations of rate constants over the temperature range of 200–800 K are provided, and the lifetimes of the reaction species in the troposphere were estimated according to rate constants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207