MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110471359 · doi:10.1364/ao.48.000f32

All-optical logic gates using nonlinear effects in silicon-on-insulator waveguides

2009· article· en· W2110471359 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammadreza Khorasaninejad, Simarjeet S. Saini

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsMaterials scienceExtinction ratioRaman scatteringLogic gateNonlinear opticsSilicon on insulatorSelf-phase modulationOptoelectronicsOptical computingCross-phase modulationPhase modulationSiliconRaman spectroscopyPhysicsElectronic engineeringLaserPhase noise

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose multiple all-optical logic operations in complementary metal oxide semiconductor compatible silicon-on-insulator waveguides based on three nonlinear phenomena, stimulated Raman scattering, free carrier absorption, and cross phase modulation. The performance of three optical logic operations is simulated by use of the finite-difference time-domain method. We achieved an extinction ratio of approximately 13 dB between two logic levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied OpticsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207