Resilience, Optimism and Social Support among International Students
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on the examination of the relationship between resilience, optimism and social support amonginternational students. International students who are studying as foreign students tend to experience greaterstress and anxiety during their study. They need to adjust to the new environment and overcome challenges. Theresilience level of students is very important as it can help them adjust their life pressures and stresses. Thecurrent study aims to look at the levels and patterns of resilience, optimism and social support amonginternational students. The instruments used were Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) for resilience,Life Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R) for optimism and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support(MSPSS) for social support. A total of 291 international students were involved in the study. The findingsrevealed a significant difference in the resiliency level across races, with African students scoring higher thanothers. The regression analysis employed showed that optimism (B=. 593) and social support (B=. 204) aresignificant predictors of resilience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it