MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110539303 · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2007.54

Cross-Layer Design for Optimizing the Performance of Clusters-Based Application Layer Schemes in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

2007· article· en· W2110539303 on OpenAlexaff
Roch Glitho, Chunyan Fu, Ferhat Khendek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)Concordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless ad hoc networkMobile ad hoc networkComputer networkLayer (electronics)Vehicular ad hoc networkDistributed computingNetwork layerAdaptive quality of service multi-hop routingOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolAd hoc wireless distribution serviceRouting (electronic design automation)Network architectureArchitectureCluster (spacecraft)Session (web analytics)WirelessRouting protocolTelecommunicationsNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A critical challenge in mobile ad hoc networks is to scale with a flat structure. Clusters are customarily used at the network layer of these networks, especially for the routing schemes required to approach this problem. Recently, their use at the application layer has also been proposed. However, this new usage faces many performance challenges. This paper focuses on how to optimize the performance of cluster-based application layer schemes in mobile ad hoc networks. It proposes an architecture based on cross-layer design, a concept employed more and more in wireless environments, and which violates reference-layered architecture. We illustrate this architecture with a case study on a cluster-based session signaling scheme. We also present a proof-of-concept prototype and our initial measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207