MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110558951 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.2002.1048821

The impact of oil decay on gassing and reliability of aging power transformers

2003· article· en· W2110558951 on OpenAlexaff
J. Sabau, L. Silberg, P. Vaillancourt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsATCO (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissolved gas analysisTransformer oilTransformerReliability (semiconductor)Land reclamationAccelerated agingElectrical equipmentElectric powerReliability engineeringForensic engineeringPetroleum engineeringVoltageEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cause of incipient electrical failures that generate gas evolvements in high voltage power transformers is currently diagnosed by interpreting the results of dissolved gas analysis (DGA). According to the existing condition-based maintenance procedures for liquid insulation, there is no relationship between the gassing tendency of oil and its degree of aging. Incipient electrical failures are considered to be solely responsible for the dissolved gas content of oil. Over the past years progress has been made in the testing procedures for insulating oils which has provided evidence that in certain cases the reclamation of aged oils reduces the level of gases generated by this complex blend of hydrocarbons. Thus, by selectively removing decay products from oils in service, the interpretation of DGA can be significantly improved and the cost effectiveness of reclamation technology economically justified. This paper intends to present evidence that besides incipient electrical failures, the purity of liquid insulation also plays a role in gas evolvement under electric and thermal stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207