MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110564803 · doi:10.1017/s0021859607007629

Modelling bovine spongiform encephalopathy

2008· article· en· W2110564803 on OpenAlexaff
J. H. M. Thornley, J. France

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Agricultural Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBovine spongiform encephalopathyInfectivityOutbreakEpidemic modelScalingBiologyDiseaseComputer scienceMathematicsVirologyPrion proteinMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY A deterministic model for the spread of an important animal disease, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), is described. It is a sparse three-pool model, the pools corresponding to susceptible, infected and sick animals. Simulations illustrate the biological meaning of the parameters, and pinpoint how parameters affect epidemic characteristics: infectivity impacts on the leading edge of the epidemic and its intensity. The times when infection is introduced and when control is exercised determine the length and possibly the intensity of the epidemic. Finally, the (single) incubation rate influences the trailing edge of the epidemic. It is applied to data describing the recent UK BSE outbreak, with reasonable success. Apart from a scaling factor, only these four quantities were adjusted to achieve this. The contributions from greater modelling complexity are discussed. It is concluded that the simple model is well suited for grasping the essentials, whereas further detail is needed for a more mechanistic representation, in particular concerning incubation delays in developing infectiousness and clinical sickness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207