Numerical Modeling of Tube Hydropiercing Using Phenomenological and Micro-Mechanical Damage Criteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydropiercing is an efficient way of piercing holes in mass produced hydroformed parts with complex geometries. By driving piercing punches radially into a hydroformed and fully pressurized tube, holes will be pierced and extruded into the tube-wall. Recent experimental studies have shown that the formability of advanced high strength steel (AHSS) tubes can be increased with the application of internal pressure. In this study, three-dimensional finite element simulations of a tube hydropiercing process of a dual phase steel (DP600) were performed in LS-DYNA, using phenomenological, micromechanical and combined damage criteria. Damage was included in the numerical analysis by applying constant equivalent plastic strain (CEPS), the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN), and the Extended GTN (GTN+JC) model. In order to calibrate the parameters in each model, a specialized hole-piercing fixture was designed and piercing tests were carried out on non-pressurized tube specimens. Of the various ductile fracture criteria, the results predicted with the GTN+JC model, such as the punch load-displacement, the roll-over depth, and the quality of the clearance zone correlated the best with the experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".