MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110604541 · doi:10.1080/10242420701422799

Linking of cytochrome P450<sub>cam</sub>and putidaredoxin by a co-ordination bridge

2007· article· en· W2110604541 on OpenAlexaff
Adina Rojubally, Shu‐Hua Cheng, Christie Foreman, Jian Huang, George R. Agnes, Erika Plettner

Bibliographic record

VenueBiocatalysis and Biotransformation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsChemistryHistidineFerredoxinStereochemistryElectron transferCytochromeCytochrome P450Substrate (aquarium)MetalloproteinEnzymePhotochemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytochrome P450cam (CYP101) catalyzes the oxidation of D(+)-camphor at the 5 position. The enzyme couples the reduction of dioxygen to the oxidation of the substrate. To transfer electrons from the reductant (NADH) to the cytochrome, two additional proteins are required. These are putidaredoxin (PdX) and putidaredoxin reductase (PdR). We have chemically linked a form of PdX with a histidine tag at the C-terminus to the P450. To accomplish this, we have modified cysteine 334 on P450 with a bipyridinyl group, and co-ordinated the C-terminal histidine tag of PdX by the addition of Ni2+ or Ru3+. The Ru3+ complex was the most stable. The non-linked system gave mostly 5-ketocamphor, a product of two consecutive hydroxylations, and H2O2, a product of 2-electron uncoupling. The Ni2+ complex gave both 5-exo-hydroxycamphor and 5-ketocamphor, but it also uncoupled. The Ru3+ complex gave a single product (5-exo-hydroxycamphor) and did not uncouple at the optimal PdR concentration. Our results are consistent with other studies of this system, in that strong binding of PdX to P450 is crucial for good coupling and for release of 5-exo-hydroxycamphor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiocatalysis and BiotransformationSame topicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation MechanismsFrench-language works237,207