MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110621567 · doi:10.1109/iemdc.2005.195857

Open-loop speed estimators design for online induction machine synchronous speed tracking

2005· article· en· W2110621567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)EstimatorStatorComputer scienceElectronic speed controlRotor (electric)Range (aeronautics)Position (finance)Vector controlOpen-loop controllerSynchronous motorInduction motorControl engineeringEngineeringMathematicsClosed loopArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Open-loop speed estimators (OLSE) and closed loop speed estimators (observers) based on flux estimation are usually inaccurate since they depend on ill-known induction machine (IM) parameters such as stator winding resistance. This paper presents two methods to track accurately the IM synchronous speed over a large speed range with OLSE. An accurate adaptive integration algorithm (AAIA) developed for quasi exact flux position and magnitude estimation over a wide speed range is used. A current based speed estimator using AAIA, which is completely independent of the IM parameters, is introduced. The accuracy of two OLSE designs was tested on a fixed frequency network and with indirect rotor flux oriented control (IRFOC) of a squirrel cage IM. These techniques were simulated on a commercial package and tested experimentally on a 1/2 HP IM and on a 3 HP IM

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207