MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110627214 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2013.6699832

A laser scanning based reverse engineering system for 3D model generation

2013· article· en· W2110627214 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Azam Javed, Seong-hoon Peter Won, Mir Behrad Khamesee, William Melek, William J. Owen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaser scanningComputer scienceReverse engineeringConveyor systemBottleScannerNoise (video)Sample (material)LaserArtificial intelligenceComputer visionEngineeringImage (mathematics)Mechanical engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a laser scanner based reverse engineering (RE) system that generates accurate 3D solid models of bottles. The proposed system is designed for ease of use and has an open architecture, making it an ideal solution for bottle conveying system manufacturers. Conveyor system manufactures need a versatile RE system that can create 3D models of bottles to develop conveyor systems for their clients. This paper also presents a simple, robust filtering technique that can effectively remove the noise from the scanned laser data, yet retaining the shape of the scanned bottle. An error analysis is performed to compare our technique against another common data filtering technique, and sample 3D models are generated to contrast the effects of the different filtering approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207