MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110629350 · doi:10.1353/can.2010.0027

When Missions Became Development: Ironies of 'NGOization' in Mainstream Canadian Churches in the 1960s

2010· article· en· W2110629350 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ruth Compton Brouwer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamOutreachFaithColonialismSociologySolidarityWork (physics)Gender studiesPolitical scienceLawPoliticsTheologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focusing mainly on the United Church of Canada, this article highlights changes in organization, discourse, and practice that were part of a missions-to-development trajectory in the mainstream churches during the 1960s and ironies arising from that shift. The article shows that, despite these churches' increasingly non-evangelistic approach to missions in this tumultuous decade and their desire to escape the taint of colonialism, globally minded young Canadians were not won over. Instead of choosing a missionary vocation, many became volunteers with Canadian University Service Overseas ( cuso ), a secular development organization founded in 1961. Meanwhile, as the United Church and other mainstream churches took on development and solidarity work in the Global South as their new 'mission,' they lost the support of conservative Christians, who continued to hold a more traditional understanding of the missionary task. Although the overseas outreach of the mainline churches survived the challenges of the 1960s, it was in a greatly changed and attenuated form. In practice, the everyday concerns of these faith-based ngo s often had little to distinguish them from the concerns of their young, secular counterparts . Ciblant principalement l'Église unie du Canada, cet article souligne les changements au sein de l'organisation, du discours et des pratiques survenus dans le cadre du recentrage, des missions vers le développement, des principales Églises dans les années 1960, de même que l'ironie née de cette réorientation. Il montre qu'en dépit du choix de ces Églises, dans le tumulte de cette décennie, de recourir à une approche de moins en moins axée sur l'évangélisation et de leur désir d'éviter toute forme de colonialisme, elles n'ont jamais su séduire les jeunes Canadiens universalistes. Au lieu de choisir les missions, plusieurs devinrent bénévoles au sein du Service universitaire canadien outremer ( suco ), un organisme laïque de développement créé en 1961. Au même moment, alors que l'Église unie et les principales autres Églises firent du travail de développement et de solidarité dans les pays en développement leur nouvelle « mission », le soutien des chrétiens conservateurs leur échappa, ceux-ci adhérant toujours à une interprétation plus traditionnelle du missionnariat. Si le rayonnement outremer des principales Églises a survécu aux défis des années 1960, ce fut sous une forme fortement revue et atténuée. En pratique, les préoccupations quotidiennes de ces ong fondées sur la foi se distinguaient peu de celles des jeunes laïques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0410.023
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207