MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110629350 · doi:10.1353/can.2010.0027

When Missions Became Development: Ironies of 'NGOization' in Mainstream Canadian Churches in the 1960s

2010· article· en· W2110629350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamOutreachFaithColonialismSociologySolidarityWork (physics)Gender studiesPolitical scienceLawPoliticsTheologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focusing mainly on the United Church of Canada, this article highlights changes in organization, discourse, and practice that were part of a missions-to-development trajectory in the mainstream churches during the 1960s and ironies arising from that shift. The article shows that, despite these churches' increasingly non-evangelistic approach to missions in this tumultuous decade and their desire to escape the taint of colonialism, globally minded young Canadians were not won over. Instead of choosing a missionary vocation, many became volunteers with Canadian University Service Overseas ( cuso ), a secular development organization founded in 1961. Meanwhile, as the United Church and other mainstream churches took on development and solidarity work in the Global South as their new 'mission,' they lost the support of conservative Christians, who continued to hold a more traditional understanding of the missionary task. Although the overseas outreach of the mainline churches survived the challenges of the 1960s, it was in a greatly changed and attenuated form. In practice, the everyday concerns of these faith-based ngo s often had little to distinguish them from the concerns of their young, secular counterparts . Ciblant principalement l'Église unie du Canada, cet article souligne les changements au sein de l'organisation, du discours et des pratiques survenus dans le cadre du recentrage, des missions vers le développement, des principales Églises dans les années 1960, de même que l'ironie née de cette réorientation. Il montre qu'en dépit du choix de ces Églises, dans le tumulte de cette décennie, de recourir à une approche de moins en moins axée sur l'évangélisation et de leur désir d'éviter toute forme de colonialisme, elles n'ont jamais su séduire les jeunes Canadiens universalistes. Au lieu de choisir les missions, plusieurs devinrent bénévoles au sein du Service universitaire canadien outremer ( suco ), un organisme laïque de développement créé en 1961. Au même moment, alors que l'Église unie et les principales autres Églises firent du travail de développement et de solidarité dans les pays en développement leur nouvelle « mission », le soutien des chrétiens conservateurs leur échappa, ceux-ci adhérant toujours à une interprétation plus traditionnelle du missionnariat. Si le rayonnement outremer des principales Églises a survécu aux défis des années 1960, ce fut sous une forme fortement revue et atténuée. En pratique, les préoccupations quotidiennes de ces ong fondées sur la foi se distinguaient peu de celles des jeunes laïques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it