MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110680040 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2002.1015175

System islanding considerations for improving power system restoration at Manitoba Hydro

2003· article· en· W2110680040 on OpenAlexaffabout
B.A. Archer, J.B. Davies

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsManitoba Hydro
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingElectric power systemForcing (mathematics)Circuit breakerLoad SheddingPower (physics)EngineeringComputer scienceMarine engineeringElectrical engineeringReliability engineeringGeologyPhysicsAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

System islanding and load shedding concepts have been discussed throughout the industry and considered for years at Manitoba Hydro. The aim is to preserve stable areas of load and generation to aid in system restoration following a major outage. If the islanding scheme operates correctly system restoration may be less complex and overall restoration time reduced by one hour or more. This paper documents studies pertaining to the islanding scheme currently in service. Following a total loss of Manitoba Hydro HVDC, considered to be one of the more significant outages that can be experienced on the power system, the system naturally forms an island due to existing relays. Due to severe undervoltages, the island may disintegrate almost Immediately after its formation. Results show that if high speed under-frequency relays are installed at the natural islanding locations, forcing the island to form at a predetermined system frequency of 59.0 Hz, and prior to its natural formation, a relatively stable northern island can be formed and preserved. The integrity of this island is sensitive to the chosen islanding frequency and speed at which separation can occur in forming the island, TRVs across associated circuit breakers must be considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207