MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110692871 · doi:10.1109/tc.2006.136

Arithmetic Operations in Finite Fields of Medium Prime Characteristic Using the Lagrange Representation

2006· article· en· W2110692871 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Claude Bajard, Laurent Imbert, Christophe Négre

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computers · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepresentation (politics)Prime (order theory)Finite fieldMathematicsSet (abstract data type)Field (mathematics)ArithmeticElliptic curveDiscrete mathematicsElliptic curve cryptographyAlgorithmComputer scienceAlgebra over a fieldCombinatoricsPure mathematicsPublic-key cryptography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a complete set of algorithms for the arithmetic operations in finite fields of prime medium characteristic. The elements of the fields IFpkare represented using the newly defined Lagrange representation, where polynomials are expressed using their values at sufficiently many points. Our multiplication algorithm, which uses a Montgomery approach, can be implemented in O(k) multiplications and O(k2log k) additions in the base field IFp. For the inversion, we propose a variant of the extended Euclidean GCD algorithm, where the inputs are given in the Lagrange representation. The Lagrange representation scheme and the arithmetic algorithms presented in the present work represent an interesting alternative for elliptic curve cryptography

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on ComputersSame topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207