MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110718527 · doi:10.1080/13506120600877201

The path of murine serum amyloid a through peritoneal macrophages

2006· article· en· W2110718527 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Kinkley, William Bagshaw, Shui‐Pang Tam, Robert Kisilevsky

Bibliographic record

VenueAmyloid · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityKingston General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene isoformCytoplasmSerum amyloid ANucleusMacrophageChemistryAmyloid (mycology)Cell biologyAcute-phase proteinAntibodyMolecular biologyBiologyBiochemistryImmunologyGeneInflammationIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Serum amyloid A (SAA) is a family of proteins encoded by four related genes. Of the four, isoforms 1.1 and 2.1 are acute phase proteins synthesized by the liver. They become major components of the HDL plasma fraction during acute tissue injury and the HDL/SAA complex is readily taken up by macrophages. Herein we investigated the path SAA follows when presented to macrophages as HDL/SAA or in liposomes. Using antibodies specific to SAA and confocal microscopy, or EM autoradiography where only SAA is radio-labeled, we show that HDL/SAA is taken up rapidly by macrophages and within 30 min SAA, or fragments thereof, proceeds through the cytoplasm to the peri-nuclear region and then the nucleus. Within 45-60 min SAA, or fragments thereof, is found back in the cytoplasm and at the plasma membrane where it is subsequently extruded. The observation that SAA, or fragments thereof, traverse the nucleus is a novel finding and may implicate SAA in macrophage gene regulation. It also raises questions by what mechanism SAA enters and leaves the nucleus. We further investigated if both SAA isoforms traffic through the macrophage in a similar manner. Isoform differences were observed. Both isoforms bind well to the plasma membrane of macrophages at 4 degrees C, but at 37 degrees C only SAA2.1 is taken up by the cell in significant quantity, and is observed in the nucleus, suggesting that the two isoforms are handled differently and that they may have discrete physiological roles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmyloidSame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207