A multi-proxy lithostratigraphic record of Late Glacial and Holocene climate variability from Piper Lake, Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A multi-proxy lithostratigraphic record from Piper Lake, Nova Scotia reveals environmental variability during the Late Glacial and Holocene. Piper Lake is a small, shallow (3 m), closed dystrophic basin located in the eastern Nova Scotia Highlands. The site was deglaciated about 14.5 cal (calibrated) ka BP and elevated loss on ignition values and relatively low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) isotope ratios indicate the establishment of a productive aquatic environment consistent with Allerød warming. The Late Glacial Lake record is punctuated by two thin, very fine-grained clay layers that are correlative to the Killarney and Younger Dryas (YD) oscillations; they were deposited when perennial ice covered the lake. The post-YD lithostratigraphy indicates the rapid establishment of an increasingly productive and stable landscape. This trend is reversed three times during the Holocene by minerogenic units. A complex 25 cm thick diamicton unique to Piper Lake was deposited ca. 10.810.3 cal ka BP by slumping that was associated with periglacial slope processes and (or) lake level changes; a direct correlation to early Holocene (Preboreal) cooling appears unlikely. Two thin minerogenic units deposited at ca. 8.1 and ca. 4.9 cal ka BP were likely the result of regional cooling and are broadly correlative with events noted in the GISP2 (Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2) ice-core record. The Holocene lithostratigraphic record from Piper Lake may be a consequence of unique limnological factors. Alternatively, the strong lithostratigraphic response may be the result of the absence of a strong and persistent regional climate mechanism (North Atlantic oscillation?), which if present might have obscured the impact of hemispheric or larger-scale climate forcing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".