CIT: A credit‐based incentive tariff scheme with fraud‐traceability for smart grid
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The growing peak‐hour power demand has invoked an urgency to increase the peak‐hour supply. Although smart grid has been envisioned as the next generation power system due to its two‐way communication of information and power, the peak‐hour power shortage problem still exists. In this paper, we propose a credit‐based incentive tariff (CIT) scheme with fraud‐traceability for smart grid. Specifically, the CIT encourages retail customers to sell the power generated by their renewable resources back to the grid during peak hours via giving additional incentive rate to them based on their credits. If a fraud is detected during the power transaction, the malicious customer's identity can be traced out and his or her credit can be correspondingly reduced. The security analysis shows that the CIT resists various security threats and makes the incentive tariff fair and more secure. The performance evaluation demonstrates that the CIT can dramatically increase the peak‐hour supply and reduce the peak‐to‐average power demand ratio by up to 7%. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it