MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110790270 · doi:10.1109/91.917115

Fuzzy models to predict consumer ratings for biscuits based on digital image features

2001· article· en· W2110790270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy logicInferenceAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemFuzzy inference systemArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer scienceFuzzy control systemFuzzy setConsumer behaviourMachine learningData miningStatisticsAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuzzy models to recognize consumer preferences were developed as part of an automated inspection system for biscuits. Digital images were used to estimate the physical features of chocolate chip cookies including size, shape, baked dough color, and fraction of top surface area that was chocolate chips. Polls were conducted to determine consumer ratings of cookies. Four fuzzy models were developed to predict consumer ratings based on three of the features. There was substantial variation in consumer ratings in terms of individual opinions, as well as poll-to-poll differences. Parameters for the inference system, including fuzzy values for cookie features and consumer ratings, were defined based on the judgment and statistical analysis of data from the calibration polls. The two fuzzy models that gave satisfactory estimates of average consumer ratings are: the Mamdani inference system based on eight fuzzy values for consumer ratings; and the Sugeno inference system developed using the adaptive neurofuzzy inference system algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it