MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110822862 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2005.1465162

Peak-to-Average Power-Ratio Reduction Algorithms for OFDM Systems via Constellation Extension

2005· article· en· W2110822862 on OpenAlexafffund
Y.J. Kou, Wu-Sheng Lu, A. Antoniou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingReduction (mathematics)AlgorithmComputer scienceExtension (predicate logic)Probabilistic logicProbabilistic analysis of algorithmsComputational complexity theoryChernoff boundMultiplexingConstellationConstellation diagramPower (physics)Bit error rateMathematicsTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New peak-to-average power-ratio (PAPR) reduction algorithms for orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) systems are investigated in a probabilistic framework. Specifically, derandomization algorithms based on the Chernoff bound for PAPR reduction are developed by applying the so-called conditional probability method. Our simulations demonstrate that the proposed algorithms outperform several existing algorithms and the computational complexity of the proposed algorithms is found to be significantly less than that of existing algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207