MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110842267 · doi:10.1002/aic.13879

Production of argon free oxygen by adsorptive air separation on Ag‐ETS‐10

2012· article· en· W2110842267 on OpenAlexaff
Meng Shi, Jihong Kim, James A. Sawada, Jade Lam, Somayeh Sarabadan, Tetyana Kuznicki, Steven M. Kuznicki

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAir separationPressure swing adsorptionArgonOxygenMolecular sieveAdsorptionChemistryChemical engineeringNitrogenMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purification of different components of air, such as oxygen, nitrogen, and argon, is an important industrial process. Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is surpassing the traditional cryogenic distillation for many air separation applications, because of its lower energy consumption. Unfortunately, the oxygen product purity in an industrial PSA process is typically limited to 95% due to the presence of argon which always shows the same adsorption equilibrium properties as oxygen on most molecular sieves. Recent work investigating the adsorption of nitrogen, oxygen and argon on the surface of silver‐exchanged Engelhard Titanosilicate‐10 (ETS‐10), indicates that this molecular sieve is promising as an adsorbent capable of producing high‐purity oxygen. High‐purity oxygen (99.7+%) was generated using a bed of Ag‐ETS‐10 granules to separate air (78% N 2 , 21% O 2 , 1% Ar) at 25°C and 100 kPa, with an O 2 recovery rate greater than 30%. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 982–987, 2013

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIChE JournalSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207