MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110850745 · doi:10.1136/eb-2012-101170

Abdominal pain duration impacts the accuracy of ultrasound for diagnosing paediatric appendicitis

2013· letter· en· W2110850745 on OpenAlexaff
Andréa S. Doria

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Medicine · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAppendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAppendicitisPerforationWeb of scienceUltrasonographyAbdominal painDiagnostic accuracyNuclear medicineRadiologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commentary on: Bachur RG, Dayan PS, Bajaj L, et al. Paediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee of the American Academy of Paediatrics. The effect of abdominal pain duration on the accuracy of diagnostic imaging for paediatric appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 2012;60:582–90.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3] Imaging has a paramount role in the management of paediatric appendicitis because of the fact that false-negative results from clinical examination lead only to a delay in diagnosis which may result in perforation of the appendix, thus increasing the morbidity of the disease. However, false-positive results lead to an increased rate of negative laparotomies. Ultrasonography (US) is an imaging modality that does not expose the patient to radiation and is relatively inexpensive, but is operator dependent. As a result, its diagnostic accuracy is highly related to the operator's level of experience. Furthermore, in many … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DAnnals%2Bof%2Bemergency%2Bmedicine%26rft.stitle%253DAnn%2BEmerg%2BMed%26rft.aulast%253DBachur%26rft.auinit1%253DR.%2BG.%26rft.volume%253D60%26rft.issue%253D5%26rft.spage%253D582%26rft.epage%253D590.e3%26rft.atitle%253DThe%2Beffect%2Bof%2Babdominal%2Bpain%2Bduration%2Bon%2Bthe%2Baccuracy%2Bof%2Bdiagnostic%2Bimaging%2Bfor%2Bpediatric%2Bappendicitis.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1016%252Fj.annemergmed.2012.05.034%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F22841176%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.05.034&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=22841176&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmed%2F18%2F6%2F224.atom

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based MedicineSame topicAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207