Stages of Development of the Russian-Japanese Trade and Economic Relations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Main purpose of the article is to classify the stages of development of Russian-Japanese economic and trade relation. Special attention is given to revealing of the features, tendencies, and characteristics of the present stage of development of the Russian-Japanese trade and economic relations. Interaction of two countries in 2000-2013 has provided an active growth of turnover. The basic priority of interaction noted in such spheres of trade as mechanical engineering, power, woods, and chemical industry. It is obvious that trade of Russia with Japan still has a character of exchange of the Russian fuel, raw materials, and seafood on the Japanese finished industrial products. The basic priorities of cooperation in such sectors as trade, mechanical engineering, energy, wood, and chemical industry are defined. Right during the newest period of 2000-2013, integration of the Russian-Japanese business on territory of the Russian Federation has got the rebirth, having embodied in numerous spheres of the Russian economy. The energy sphere is still a leading sphere of trade and economic relations of Russia and Japan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".