Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte aborde le problème de la transposition de certains éléments de l’environnement matériel nomade dans le cadre de la sédentarité. Pourquoi le groupe a-t-il besoin de préserver un certain nombre d’objets issus de son ancien mode de vie et de les faire perdurer dans de nouvelles conditions économiques et culturelles ? Pourquoi choisit-il tel objet plutôt que tel autre ? Quelles fonctions cet objet remplit-il alors ? Les réponses à ces questions transparaissent à travers l’exemple des nattes-paravents isabran (sing.ésaber) chez certaines tribus Kel Ajjer récemment sédentarisées. Il ressort de l’analyse que les savoirs liés à leur utilisation et à leur fabrication impliquent des rapports économiques et socio-culturels complexes et font que la natte-paravent, en tant que support de valeurs traditionnelles importantes, devient un moyen symbolique de reconstruction de la société touarègue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".