Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les antécédents de maltraitance chez un des parents sont un facteur de risque fortement associé à la présence contemporaine de maltraitance, en particulier chez la clientèle suivie par la protection de la jeunesse (PJ). Le manque de connaissance sur la qualité, la quantité et l’efficacité de l’intervention en PJ faite auprès des familles maltraitantes sur plus d’une génération est questionnant. Cette étude a pour but l’analyse de la perception des intervenants en PJ face à cette question. Ces derniers manifestent une impuissance certaine puisqu’ils doivent entreprendre auprès de ces parents une intervention intensive, stable et à long terme, dans un contexte où ils sont surchargés de dossiers, où la continuité des services est bafouée et où la relation de confiance est difficile à établir. Une réflexion est amorcée sur la possibilité de briser le cycle de la transmission intergénérationnelle, compte tenu du mandat législatif de l’intervention en PJ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".