Responses to Central Na <sup>+</sup> and Ouabain Are Attenuated in Transgenic Rats Deficient in Brain Angiotensinogen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies with angiotensin (Ang) II type 1 receptor blockers suggest that the brain renin-angiotensin system contributes to sodium-induced sympathoexcitation and hypertension. To provide more specific evidence for the involvement of Ang II, locally produced in the brain, transgenic rats were used, which express an antisense RNA against angiotensinogen mRNA specifically in the brain, reducing angiotensinogen levels in the brain by >90%. In freely moving transgenic rats and Sprague-Dawley rats as control animals, blood pressure and heart rate responses to intracerebroventricular infusion (3.8 microL/min for 10 minutes) of artificial cerebrospinal fluid and Na(+)-rich artificial cerebrospinal fluid (containing 0.2, 0.3, and 0.45 mol/L Na(+)) as well as intracerebroventricular injection of ouabain (0.3 and 0.6 microgram/2 microL) were assessed. Central infusion of Na(+)-rich artificial cerebrospinal fluid increased blood pressure and heart rate in a dose-related manner. However, the peak increases by each dose of Na(+) were attenuated by 50% to 70% in the transgenic versus Sprague-Dawley rats. Increases in blood pressure and heart rate in response to ouabain at both doses were attenuated by 55% to 70% in the transgenic versus Sprague-Dawley rats. In the hypothalamus, Ang I level was markedly lower (31+/-9 versus 76+/-13 pg/g, P<0.05) and Ang II level tended to be lower in the transgenic versus Sprague-Dawley rats. These results indicate that the production of angiotensins in the brain is decreased in transgenic rats. The attenuated sympathoexcitatory and pressor responses to ouabain and Na(+)-rich artificial cerebrospinal fluid in transgenic rats support the concept that the local brain renin-angiotensin system, that is, locally produced Ang II, plays an important role in the sympathoexcitatory effects of ouabain and sodium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".