MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2110872938 · doi:10.1115/fuelcell2012-91415

Pore Space Characterization of Compressed PEMFC GDLs Using 3D Micro-Computed Tomography

2012· article· en· W2110872938 on OpenAlexafffund
Pradyumna R. Challa, Aimy Bazylak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPorosityMaterials scienceProton exchange membrane fuel cellGaseous diffusionTomographyMultiphase flowCharacterization (materials science)Composite materialFuel cellsChemical engineeringEngineeringMechanicsPhysicsNanotechnologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, micro-computed tomography was employed to characterize the effect of rib and channel compression on the through-plane porosity distributions of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) gas diffusion layers (GDLs). Two GDLs with micro-porous layers (MPLs): a paper based GDL (GDL A), and a felt GDL (GDL B) were compressed at 1.2 MPa in an ex situ flow field apparatus with 1mm × 1mm channels. Porosity distributions of compressed GDLs were compared with those of uncompressed GDLs, and the microstructural differences caused during the manufacturing of paper, felt, and cloth GDLs are discussed. The results of this study will aid modellers in generating realistic stochastic GDL pore structures for multiphase flow simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→