Antagonism of the α4 integrin subunit attenuates the acute inflammatory response to stent implantation yet is insufficient to prevent late intimal formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mononuclear leukocytes infiltrate the artery wall via integrin-mediated mechanisms and play an integral role in intimal formation after stenting. We sought to determine if acute antagonism of the alpha4 subunit of very late antigen-4 is sufficient for the late attenuation of stent intimal area (IA). Twenty-four hypercholesterolemic rabbits underwent iliac artery balloon injury, followed 2 weeks later by stent implantation, and the animals were randomized to receive an anti-alpha4 antibody (HP1/2) or a nonspecific isotypic control immunoglobulin (1E6) intravenously 1 h before stenting. Compared with controls, HP1/2-treated rabbits showed 50%, 51%, and 44% reductions in the percentage on intimal cells that were macrophages on days 3, 7, and 28 after stenting and a 59% reduction in intimal proliferation on day 3. Although stent IA was reduced by 63% and 48% in the antibody-treated group compared with the control group on days 3 and 7, this difference was not present on day 28. These data highlight the need for sustained, anti-inflammatory therapies for the prevention of stent intimal formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".