MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110899272 · doi:10.1109/cnsr.2009.45

FPGA Implementation of a Novel Compensation Technique for EER Amplifiers

2009· article· en· W2110899272 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Morash, Colin O’Flynn, Jacek Ilow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierComputer scienceElectronic engineeringDistortion (music)Field-programmable gate arrayCompensation (psychology)Filter (signal processing)Nonlinear distortionEnvelope (radar)Total harmonic distortionLinear amplifierDifferential amplifierElectrical engineeringEngineeringComputer hardwareTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines a practical method to reduce the spectral distortion at the output of an envelope elimination and restoration (EER) power amplifier (PA). The EER amplifiers utilized in terrestrial amplitude modulation (AM) radio broadcast transmitters are affected by non-linear and memory effects; the proposed compensation method exploits the source of these effects in real-world amplifiers. Specifically, using a new feed forward configuration for pre-processing the amplifier input, the algorithm predicts the PA output in real-time using its realistic behavior modeled through dynamic differential equations. The compensation method implemented at the base band considers the effects created by the most critical components of the EER amplifier, i.e, band-limiting of the envelope by the reconstruction filter and a non-linear load applied at the output of the reconstruction filter. The performance improvements of the proposed method are measured by its ability to reduce total harmonic distortion (THD) at the output of the system. Taking advantage of the efficient utilization of available computational resources, the feasibility of implementing this system is verified using a FPGA platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207