MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110916030 · doi:10.1002/qua.20883

Conformational and electronic study of<i>N</i>‐acetyl‐<scp>L</scp>‐isoleucine‐<i>N</i>‐methylamide using DFT and IPCM calculations

2006· article· en· W2110916030 on OpenAlexaff
Ana M. Rodrı́guez, Joseph C.P Koo, Dante Rojas, Nélida M. Peruchena, Ricardo D. Enriz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsChemistryPolarizable continuum modelComputational chemistryPolarizabilityQuantum chemicalElectronic structureMoleculeStereochemistryChloroformAcetonitrileConformational isomerismOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A conformational and electronic study onN‐acetyl‐L‐isoleucine‐N‐methylamide was carried out. All side‐chain as well as backbone conformations were explored for this compound. Multidimensional conformational analysis predicts 81 structures in the case ofN‐acetyl‐L‐isoleucine‐N‐methylamide, 53 relaxed structures were determined at the DFT (B3LYP/6‐31G(d)) level of theory. An exhaustive electronic study employing the atoms‐in‐molecules (AIM) method was carried out. In addition, the effects of three solvents (water, acetonitrile, and chloroform) were included in the calculations using the isodensity polarizable continuum model (IPCM) method. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Quantum ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207