MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110942596 · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq269

Interference with Bile Salt Export Pump Function Is a Susceptibility Factor for Human Liver Injury in Drug Development

2010· article· en· W2110942596 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan E. Morgan, Michael Trauner, Carlo J. van Staden, Paul H. Lee, Bharath Ramachandran, Michael Eschenberg, Cynthia A. Afshari, Charles W. Qualls, Ruth Lightfoot-Dunn, Hisham K. Hamadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicological Sciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBile Salt Export PumpLiver injuryMultidrug resistance-associated protein 2TransporterCholestasisXenobioticEffluxDrugPharmacologyBile acidBiologyMedicineBiochemistryATP-binding cassette transporterEndocrinologyGeneEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bile salt export pump (BSEP) is an efflux transporter, driving the elimination of endobiotic and xenobiotic substrates from hepatocytes into the bile. More specifically, it is responsible for the elimination of monovalent, conjugated bile salts, with little or no assistance from other apical transporters. Disruption of BSEP activity through genetic disorders is known to manifest in clinical liver injury such as progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2. Drug-induced disruption of BSEP is hypothesized to play a role in the development of liver injury for several marketed or withdrawn therapeutics. Unfortunately, preclinical animal models have been poor predictors of the liver injury associated with BSEP interference observed for humans, possibly because of interspecies differences in bile acid composition, differences in hepatobiliary transporter modulation or constitutive expression, as well as other mechanisms. Thus, a BSEP-mediated liver liability may go undetected until the later stages of drug development, such as during clinical trials or even postlicensing. In the absence of a relevant preclinical test system for BSEP-mediated liver injury, the toxicological relevance of available in vitro models to human health rely on the use of benchmark compounds with known clinical outcomes, such as marketed or withdrawn drugs. In this study, membrane vesicles harvested from BSEP-transfected insect cells were used to assess the activity of more than 200 benchmark compounds to thoroughly investigate the relationship between interference with BSEP function and liver injury. The data suggest a relatively strong association between the pharmacological interference with BSEP function and human hepatotoxicity. Although the most accurate translation of risk would incorporate pharmacological potency, pharmacokinetics, clearance mechanisms, tissue distribution, physicochemical properties, indication, and other drug attributes, the additional understanding of a compound's potency for BSEP interference should help to limit or avoid BSEP-related liver liabilities in humans that are not often detected by standard preclinical animal models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations330
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToxicological SciencesSame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207