Identification of motor neuron disease using wavelet domain features extracted from EMG signal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a common fatal motor neuron disease that assails the nerve cells in the brain. As the nervous system controls the muscle activity, the electromyography (EMG) signals can be viewed and examined in order to detect the vital features of the ALS disease in individuals. In this paper, the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) based features, which are extracted from a frame of EMG data, are introduced to classify the normal person and the ALS patients. From each frame of EMG data, instead of using a large number of DWT coefficients, the DWT coefficients with higher values as well as their mean and maxima are proposed to be used, which drastically reduces the feature dimension. It is shown that the proposed feature vector offers a high within class compactness and between class separations. For the purpose of classification, the K-nearest neighborhood classifier is employed. In order to demonstrate the classification performance, an EMG database consisted of 5 normal subjects and 5 ALS patients is considered and it is found that the proposed method is capable of distinctly separating the ALS patients from the normal persons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".