MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110943775 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2013.6572094

Identification of motor neuron disease using wavelet domain features extracted from EMG signal

2013· article· en· W2110943775 on OpenAlexaff
Shaikh Anowarul Fattah, Abul Doulah, Md Asif Iqbal, Celia Shahnaz, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceElectromyographyWaveletWavelet transformSupport vector machineAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisDiscrete wavelet transformComputer scienceFeature extractionFeature vectorMedicineDiseaseNeurosciencePsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a common fatal motor neuron disease that assails the nerve cells in the brain. As the nervous system controls the muscle activity, the electromyography (EMG) signals can be viewed and examined in order to detect the vital features of the ALS disease in individuals. In this paper, the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) based features, which are extracted from a frame of EMG data, are introduced to classify the normal person and the ALS patients. From each frame of EMG data, instead of using a large number of DWT coefficients, the DWT coefficients with higher values as well as their mean and maxima are proposed to be used, which drastically reduces the feature dimension. It is shown that the proposed feature vector offers a high within class compactness and between class separations. For the purpose of classification, the K-nearest neighborhood classifier is employed. In order to demonstrate the classification performance, an EMG database consisted of 5 normal subjects and 5 ALS patients is considered and it is found that the proposed method is capable of distinctly separating the ALS patients from the normal persons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207