MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110947194 · doi:10.1115/1.2802112

An Analytical Solution for Shear Stress Distributions During Oblique Elastic Impact of Similar Spheres

2007· article· en· W2110947194 on OpenAlexafffund
Philip P. Garland, Robert J. Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOblique caseSPHERESMechanicsComputationSlip (aerodynamics)Coulomb frictionShear (geology)CoulombClassical mechanicsPhysicsMaterials scienceMathematicsComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new solution method for the oblique elastic impact of similar spheres with Coulomb friction is presented. The solution uses approximations of the shear stress distributions at each time step during impact. These distributions are solved from analytical formulations and are able to account for both full sliding and partial-slip scenarios that may both be present for this problem due to inclusion of tangential compliance and friction effects. Comparison to previous continuum models in the literature shows very good agreement for the contact force wave forms obtained. The major advantage of this method is the drastic reduction in computation time required compared to previous solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational and Nonlinear DynamicsSame topicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsFrench-language works237,207