MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110947992 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.110036

Sonographic Assessment of a Bifid Median Nerve and Median Artery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2011· article· en· W2110947992 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Angel Checa, Humaira Hussain

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedian nerveCarpal tunnel syndromeCarpal tunnelUltrasoundAnatomyNerve conductionRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous variants of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel, such as a bifid morphology, have been reported1. The prevalence of bifid median nerve with or without a persistent median artery continues to be intriguing. However, a bifid nerve has been observed in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The nerve compression via trauma, dilatation, thrombosis, and arterial calcification is disputed2. An ultrasound scan in longitudinal and transverse planes at the volar aspect of both wrists, at the level of the carpal tunnel, was obtained in 3 patients. Scans were performed using a GE Logiq e ultrasound machine equipped with a broadband linear probe from 8 to 13 MHz. The first case, an 80-year-old woman with history of osteoarthritis of the hands, presented with tingling and numbness at the median nerve area in the right …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicPeripheral Nerve DisordersFrench-language works237,207