Minimum-structure borehole gravity inversion for mineral exploration: A synthetic modeling study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT A borehole gravimeter for the diameters of holes typically used in mineral exploration has recently been developed. Investigating how the data from such instruments can contribute to the gravity interpretation procedures used in mineral exploration is therefore appropriate. Here, results are presented from a study in which synthetic data for 3D exploration-relevant earth models were inverted and the impact of borehole data assessed. The inversions were carried out using a minimum-structure procedure that is typical of those commonly used to invert surface gravity data. Examples involving data from a single borehole, from multiple boreholes, and combinations of borehole and surface data, are considered. Also, a range of options for the particulars of the inversion algorithm are investigated, including using a reference model and cell weights to incorporate along-borehole density information, and an l1-type measure of model structure. The selection of examples presented demonstrates what one can and cannot expect to determine about the density variation around and between boreholes when borehole gravity data are inverted using a minimum-structure approach. Specifically, the density variation along a borehole can be accurately determined, even without constraints in the inversion, but this capability decreases dramatically a few tens of meters from a borehole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".