MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110989348 · doi:10.1080/07373930701397301

Efficacy of Vacuum Microwave Drying in Microbial Decontamination of Dried Vegetables

2007· article· en· W2110989348 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Inactivation Methods
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowaveHuman decontaminationVacuum dryingAtmospheric pressureMoistureMicrowave heatingWater contentPopulationMicroorganismFood scienceChemistryMaterials scienceFreeze-dryingWaste managementChromatographyBacteriaComposite materialBiologyMedicineMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The efficacy of vacuum microwave drying and a combination of microwave processing at atmospheric pressure + vacuum microwave drying on decontamination of freshly grated carrots and parsley leaves from naturally occurring microorganisms was studied. Samples were dried to < 8% moisture content under microwave radiation (2450 MHz, 1.8 kW) with either full vacuum or combination of 12 min atmospheric pressure and 46 min vacuum process. In the microwave under vacuum process the microbial population was reduced gradually as the exposure time increased, while in the combined method a dramatic decrease in microbial counts after 5 min exposure to microwave radiation at atmospheric pressure was observed. Keywords: CarrotDryingParsleyTotal aerobic countsVacuum microwaveYeast and molds Notes abc Within a row, values not sharing the same subscript are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it