MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110991424 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.017

Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial of Mirabegron in Patients with Overactive Bladder

2012· article· en· W2110991424 on OpenAlexaffabout
Victor W. Νitti, Stephen M. Auerbach, Nancy Martin, Alaina Calhoun, Misun Lee, Sender Herschorn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAstellas Pharma
KeywordsMirabegronOveractive bladderMedicinePlaceboAdverse effectUrologyUrinationRandomized controlled trialUrinary incontinenceUrinary systemInternal medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Many patients with overactive bladder discontinue pharmacotherapy due to suboptimal efficacy or side effects. Mirabegron, a β3-adrenoceptor agonist, may offer an effective and well tolerated alternative treatment for overactive bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial was conducted in the United States and Canada. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, adults with overactive bladder symptoms for 3 or more months were randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo, 50 or 100 mg mirabegron once daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy data were collected via patient completed diaries and quality of life assessments. Co-primary efficacy end points were changes from baseline to final visit in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours and micturitions per 24 hours. Key secondary micturition and incontinence end points were also evaluated. Safety assessments included treatment emergent adverse events, laboratory assessments, vital signs, electrocardiograms and post-void residual volume. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, 50 and 100 mg mirabegron groups demonstrated statistically significantly greater mean decreases (95% CI) from baseline for incontinence episodes (-1.13 [-1.35, -0.91], -1.47 [-1.69, -1.25] and -1.63 [-1.86, -1.40]) and micturitions (-1.05 [-1.31, -0.79], -1.66 [-1.92, -1.40] and -1.75 [-2.01, -1.48]) per 24 hours (p <0.05). Significant improvements in all key secondary end points were observed for both mirabegron doses vs placebo. The incidence of frequently reported treatment emergent adverse events (hypertension, urinary tract infection, headache, nasopharyngitis) was similar in the mirabegron and placebo groups. Dry mouth was reported for 1.5%, 0.5% and 2.1% of patients in the placebo, 50 and 100 mg mirabegron groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily mirabegron in a 50 or 100 mg dose is an effective treatment for overactive bladder symptoms with a low occurrence of side effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations368
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207