Adverse prognostic significance of CD20 expression in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prognostic significance of CD20 expression in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) has been mostly studied in children and yielded conflicting results. In 143 adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative BCP-ALL treated in the multicentric GRAALL 2003 trial, CD20 positivity over 20% was observed in 32% of patients. While not influencing complete remission achievement, CD20 expression was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 42 months (P=0.04), independently of the ALL high-risk subset (P=0.025). Notably, the negative impact of CD20 expression on CIR was only observed in patients with a white blood cell count (WBC) over 30x10(9)/L (P=0.006), while not in those with a lower WBC. In the former subgroup, this impact translated into lower event-free survival (15% vs. 59% at 42 months, P=0.003). CD20 expression thus appears to be associated with a worse outcome, which reinforces the interest of evaluating rituximab combined to chemotherapy in CD20-positive adult BCP-ALL. ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT00222027.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it