Les insectes ravageurs importants de la pomme de terre au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potato crop is estimated to contribute 63% to the vegetable revenue in Canada. Like most agricultural crops, the potato crop yield is compromised by attacks of several insect pests during the growing season. Pests such as the Colorado potato beetle, the European corn borer, wireworms and tuber flea beetle can cause serious problems for potato production. Lack of control applications can result in major economic losses to the producer. In Canada, growers employ an Integrated Pest Management approach by using several techniques to manage and keep pest populations below economic thresholds in the potato crop. Some of the techniques used are: monitoring populations with pheromone and bait traps, use of degree days to estimate emergence, scouting fields to determine population levels, use of economic thresholds for a more precise application of insecticides and biological, cultural and mechanical control techniques. The objective of several research projects in Canada is to develop and refine control techniques and obtain a better understanding of the pests. The main objective for both the growers and the researchers is to reduce the amount of pesticides needed to control these insect pests in potatoes, while maintaining economic benefits for the producers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".