MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111055962 · doi:10.7202/010578ar

Des pratiques autour des jeunes/enfants des rues : une perspective internationale

2005· article· fr· W2111055962 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jacinthe Rivard

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’avènement de programmes d’intervention originaux qui s’intéressent aux jeunes des rues sur le plan mondial permet d’appréhender, dans cette même perspective, le phénomène auquel ils sont associés. Le présent article vise à mettre en lumière, par le biais du discours international, l’existence de courants de pensée et de systèmes de représentations dominants, en jetant un regard sur leur évolution. Ces idéologies sont ensuite mises en dialogue avec certaines notions du courant dit « alternatif », qui engendrent des fondements théoriques et idéologiques de même que des représentations des jeunes des rues, qui peuvent prétendre à une certaine universalité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.016
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicCommunity Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207