CL316,243 and Cold Stress Induce Heterogeneous Expression of UCP1 mRNA and Protein in Rodent Brown Adipocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1), the mammalian thermogenic mitochondrial protein, is found only in brown adipocytes, but its expression by immunohistochemistry is not homogeneous. Here we present evidence that the non-homogeneous pattern of immunostaining for UCP1 (referred to as the "Harlequin phenomenon") is particularly evident after acute and chronic cold (4C) stimulus and after administration of a specific beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist (CL316,243). Accordingly, mRNA in situ expression confirmed the UCP1 non-homogeneous pattern of gene activation under conditions of adrenergic stimulus. Furthermore, morphometric analysis of immunogold-stained thin sections showed that UCP1-gold particle density was different among neighboring brown adipocytes with mitochondria of the same size and density. When the adrenergic stimulus was reduced in warm-acclimated animals (28C), UCP1 protein and mRNA expression was reduced and consequently the Harlequin phenomenon was barely visible. These data suggest the existence of an alternative and controlled functional recruitment of brown adipocytes in acute adrenergically stressed animals, possibly to avoid heat and metabolic damage in thermogenically active cells. Of note, the heat shock protein heme oxygenase 1 (HO1) is heterogeneously expressed in adrenergically stimulated brown adipose tissue and, specifically, cells expressing strong immunoreactivity for UCP1 also strongly express HO1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".