Blood pressure targets in the very old: development of a tool in a geriatric day hospital.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PROBLEM ADDRESSED: Canadian hypertension guidelines do not address blood pressure (BP) targets in the very old (older than 85 years of age), making BP management in this group difficult. OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: To develop a BP target tool and implementation process in order to facilitate management of BP in the very old at the Bruyère Continuing Care Geriatric Day Hospital in Ottawa, Ont. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: A BP target tool and implementation process were developed to target, monitor, and communicate BP goals within the care team, to the patient and family, and to other prescribers. An audit was conducted of the first 10 weeks of the tool's implementation and illustrated good use with areas for improvement noted. CONCLUSION: The development and use of a BP target tool increased prescriber consistency and confidence in managing BP in the very old. The tool filled a gap in the absence of guidelines specific to BP management in the very old. The BP target tool has implications for practice, as well as for the training of health care professionals involved in treating and monitoring BP in very old patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.053 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".