Measurement of Lung Hyperelastic Properties Using Inverse Finite Element Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperelastic properties of deflated lung tissue have been characterized via an inverse finite element approach. Such properties are useful in many medical diagnosis and treatment applications where tissue deformation can be modeled to account for during the procedure. Several indentation experiments were conducted on various porcine lungs' tissue specimens resected immediately from different regions and lobes after the animals were sacrificed. Three different strain energy models, namely Ogden, Yeoh, and Polynomial, were used and respective hyperelastic parameters were obtained. The parameters for each model were estimated through an optimization process where the experimental force-displacement profiles of indentation were fitted to those obtained from finite element simulations performed specifically for the samples' geometries. Results obtained in this investigation for all the three models indicate convergence with reasonably low average fitting errors ranging from 2.3% to 6.2%. Independent tests were also performed to assess the effects of samples' heterogeneities on the obtained parameters. The outcome of these tests was encouraging and confirmed small impact of tissue inhomogeneities on the estimated parameters. The reported hyperelastic properties can, accordingly, pave the way for more accurate biomechanical modeling of the lung's soft tissue in the emerging applications of minimally invasive medical intervention for lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it