MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111115220 · doi:10.1109/wwos.1989.109260

Efficient shared memory for testing parallel algorithms on distributed systems

2003· article· en· W2111115220 on OpenAlexaff
M. Stella Atkins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUnixEthernetWorkstationShared memoryParallel computingDistributed memoryLocal area networkComputationNode (physics)Parallel algorithmDistributed computingDistributed shared memoryMemory managementAlgorithmOperating systemUniform memory accessSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A distributed data structure called a MOOSE (modifiable object structure), which is both efficient enough and general enough to be used by a wide variety of parallel algorithms, is outlined. The MOOSE structure is aimed at a loosely coupled distributed system in which several processors are connected over a local area network. It is implemented in the high-level distributed programming language SR on several Sun-2 and Sun-3 workstations running the Unix operating system and connected by an Ethernet. The MOOSE shared memory has been designed with customizable features for efficiency of implementation in such an environment. This enables the communication and computation performance of parallel algorithms on non-shared-memory hardware to be studied. If the application is run in the background on several network nodes, automatic load balancing is achieved and the programs may be tolerant of node failure during the computation.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207