MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111118777

Applying fusion in thermal face recognition

2012· article· en· W2111118777 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Váňa, Štěpán Mráček, Martin Drahanský, Ahmad Poursaberi, Svetlana Yanushkevich

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Biometrics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacial recognition systemComputer scienceBiometricsLivenessArtificial intelligenceModalPattern recognition (psychology)Face (sociological concept)Computer visionMachine learningTheoretical computer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Face recognition based on thermal images has minor importance in comparison to visible light spectrum recognition. Nevertheless, in the applications such as liveness detection or fever scan, the thermal face recognition is used as a stand-alone module, or as a part of a multi-modal biometric system. This paper investigates the combinations of many methods, used for thermal face recognition, and introduces some new and modified algorithms, which have not been used in this area yet. Moreover, we show that the choice of the best method is always limited to a certain database (input data). In order to address this problem, the multi-algorithmic biometric fusion based on the logistic regression is deployed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on BiometricsSame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207