Effect of sedimentary cadmium on the behavior of a burrowing mayfly (Ephemeroptera, <i>Hexagenia limbata</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Behavioral responses of aquatic invertebrates can serve as precocious indicators of adverse effects caused by metals. We conducted experiments to determine if the behavior of nymphs of the burrowing mayfly Hexagenia limbara (Ephemeroptera) was modified by the presence of cadmium (Cd) in sediments. We first exposed H. limbata to concentrations of sedimentary Cd found in lakes subject to smelter emissions (20 microg/g dry wt). We then compared the burrowing activity of control and Cd-contaminated nymphs by means of radiographs. We also studied the time allotted by nymphs to various activities (irrigation, walking, burrowing/feeding, cleaning, and turning) as determined from films taken using an infrared video camera. The results obtained suggest no significant difference in the burrowing activity of control versus Cd-contaminated individuals. Furthermore, the time spent in various behavioral activities was similar between control and Cd-contaminated nymphs. Given these results, we conclude that Cd has no effect on the behavior of H. limbata for the range of Cd concentrations that we measured in nymphs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".