Crustal structure of NW British Columbia and SE Alaska from seismic wide‐angle studies: Coast Plutonic Complex to Stikinia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crustal structure beneath the transition from the Coast belt to the Intermontane superterrane of the northern Canadian Cordillera is interpreted from the inversion of refraction and wide‐angle reflection seismic data. The profile traverses an accretionary suture zone (Coast Plutonic Complex) to continental crust deformed by the transpressive collision (Stikine terrane). Using data acquired by the Accrete onshore/offshore experiment and by a partially overlapping Lithoprobe onshore experiment, P wave travel time inversion and forward amplitude modeling are employed to determine crustal velocity structure. The model exhibits a well‐defined transition throughout the crust that distinguishes the Coast Plutonic Complex (CPC) from Stikinia. Average crustal velocities beneath the CPC (6.45 km/s) are considerably faster than those beneath Stikinia (6.25 km/s). Crustal thickness also changes across the transition; thin crust beneath the Coast belt (30–32 km) thickens beneath Stikinia (35–37 km). The observations within the Coast belt are consistent with a tectonic history most recently dominated by extensional deformation. Primary structural control could be associated with either Neogene extension and/or the processes that are responsible for exhuming the Coast belt during the early Paleogene and have been inferred from geological studies. Slow mantle velocities (7.8–7.9 km/s) beneath the entire profile are indicative of high upper mantle temperatures. Comparison with the southern Cordilleran Coast belt reveals similar velocity structure within the massive plutonic complexes. However, substantial differences between the northern and southern Coast belts emphasize along‐strike variations in terranes, orogen geometry and postorogenic tectonics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".