Les structures sémiotiques des images de l’album pour enfants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’album de contes pour enfants constitue un instrument privilégié d’apprentissage parce qu’il lie très étroitement le plaisir de l’imaginaire au déchiffrage de la lecture. Les images qui tissent l’essentiel de ces récits relèvent de plusieurs codes de représentation auxquels sont associés les valeurs et les intérêts de la lecture. Nous nous sommes d’abord interrogée sur la nature de la production des signes afin de comprendre le fonctionnement des éléments des divers codes interreliés dans le récit iconique, puis nous avons élaboré une méthode d’analyse et d’observation susceptible d’en révéler certains niveaux de compréhension. Une expérimentation a été réalisée auprès de 69 enfants, âgés de 6 à 9 ans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it